here's one for you sweetie; i've never read the cannabis grow bible, don't know who wrote it... and it is irrelevent, as this info has been altered in several ways. therefore, it is NOT plagerism. not only have the excerpts been altered (your man loves typos...) but it is even stated, "from marijuanahydro.com"
don't believe me? here's a fucking link...
http://www.marijuanahydro.com/mature...anaplants.html
now, tell me mister pissed off about plagerism dude, where the fuck does it say who wrote this? i don't see it... if it was there, then it would be noted at the beginning of the thread. if this info had been taken from a book, then all titles/authors would have been noted. i am NOT a plagerist, i have not attempted to take credit for "writing" this info...
i take credit for creating this thread. now, if you can show me that this came "directly" from the grow bible, and give me authors, page numbers, etc., i'd be happy to ask bobbong to place it in the beginning of the thread. if not, then get off my back, and help other noobs find this thread.
and just a side line... this thread was created because of 50 year vet growers bieng assholes and not answering questions. that is why i've become so popular; not only do i say, "you need to read some more", i also show them what to read, where to find it...
you get my point?
now, on the offhand, plagerism is defined as copying directly another's work; this is not exact, has been altered, changed, mixed up....
therefore, kindprincess is guilty of no overt plagerism. mr. 50 year grower? get off my fucking back please. if you're going to get on a soap box, then try to do so with someone who has not read the dictionary. before you go on about plagerism again, here's that link ...
http://www.marijuanahydro.com/mature...anaplants.html
don't you love copy/paste?
kp