Quote:
Originally Posted by 8182KSKUSH
I love it when you challenge an idea with actual facts and information, and the only response is a flowery worded anti-America rant, that has nothing to do with or addressing any of the SPECIFICS OF WHAT WAS BEING DISCUSSED. At least it's appealing to the sheeple that subscribe to the "I hate America" ideology! I am sure none of them will notice that you basically just repeated the same rubbish over again while not acknowledging anything that could put into question the premise of this thread. Just pretend there is nothing to the contrary, and repeat, "It's all Bush's fault. WMD's, Katrina, Blah blah blah blah blah."
Psycho this is not directed at you personally, it is a characterization of how liberals tend to carry on debate in general, it just so happens you provided a real time example.  |
It's only proving psychocats point. If you look at it with objectivity, you would realize the evidence against Murat Kurnaz is circumstancial at best. It's enough to warrant investigation and putting him a watch list based on the evidence. It's not beyond doubt. You should answer his question, innocent before proven guilty, or guilty before proving innocent?
I'm not saying that they had to right to hold him, but being sent to GITMO based on flimsy evidence? Ridiculous.