![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Ireland Ireland |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
| Cannabis Links |
|
Legal Bud | Rolling Papers | Herbal Smoke | Herbal Vaporizer Scales & Accessories | Cheap Vaporizers | Seeds Cannabis
|
|
||||
|
come on ireland and europe.. has no one an opinion on the lisbon treaty. thats whats wrong these days. we are letting politicians pass laws in our names and no one seems to give a shit. wake up europe and demand your government gives you a referendem on this treaty. and let the people of europe have their say.
|
|
||||
|
the big con job
go to infowars ireland and watch the "LISBON TREATY EXPLAINED" video. its what you didnt see on the RTE news. basicly the treaty is an unreadable document whose hundreds of pages must be referenced off other previous treaties that have been rejected by the dutch and i think french voters. the eu is trying to pull the wool over peoples eyes on this. watch the video man,it might point you in the right direction.
|
|
||||
|
1. Would be a power-grab by the Big States for control of the EU by basing EU law-making after Lisbon primarily on population size. At present EU laws are made by a majority of States(14 or more), as long as they have between them 255 weighted votes out of 345. Under this system the Big States have 29 votes each and Ireland has 7. Under the Lisbon Treaty EU laws would be made by a majority of States(15 or more), as long as they have 65% of the total EU population between them. This change would double Germany’s voting power in making European laws from its present 8% to 17%, increase Britain’s, France’s and Italy’s from 8% to 12% each, and halve Ireland’s vote to 0.8%. How does reducing our vote in EU law-making to 0.8% put Ireland “at the heart of Europe” ? Or induce the other EU Member States to listen to our concerns on unemployment and help resolve the economic crisis in the interest of Irish companies, workers and farmers?
2. Would copperfasten the Laval and related judgements of the EU Court of Justice, which put the competition rules of the EU market above the right of trade unions to enforce pay standards higher than the minimum for migrant workers. At the same time Lisbon gives the EU full control of immigration policy(Art.79 TFEU). 3. Would permit the post-Lisbon EU to impose its own EU-wide taxes directly on us for the first time in order to raise its own resources for the EU itself, without the need of further Treaties or referendums(Art.311 TFEU). 4. Would amend the existing treaties to give the EU exclusive power as regards rules on foreign direct investment(Arts.206-7 TFEU) and give the EU Court of Justice the power to order the harmonisation of national indirect taxes if it judges that these cause a “distortion of competition” in the market (Art.113 TFEU). These steps would threaten our 12.5% corporation profits tax, which is the principal attraction of Ireland for foreign business. 5. Would abolish the European Community which Ireland joined in 1973 and replace it with a legally new European Union in the constitutional form of a Federal EU State (Art.1 TEU). This post-Lisbon EU would for the first time be legally separate from and superior to its 27 Member States and would sign international treaties with other States in all areas of its powers (Arts.1 and 47 TEU; Declaration 17 concerning Primacy). In constitutional terms Lisbon would thereby turn Ireland into a regional or provincial state within this new Federal-style European Union, with the EU’s Constitution and laws having legal primacy over the Irish Constitution and laws in any cases of conflict between the two. Ireland would thus formally cease to be a sovereign independent State in its own right in the international community of States and be like a provincial state in an EU Federation. 6. Would turn us into real citizens of the constitutionally Federal post-Lisbon European Union, owing obedience to its laws and loyalty to its authority over and above our obedience and loyalty to Ireland and the Irish Constitution and laws in the event of any conflict between the two. One can only be a citizen of a State. The Irish people were not that happy when they were citizens of the UK State. Although as citizens of the post-Lisbon Federal EU we would still keep our Irish citizenship, this would be subordinate to our EU citizenship and to the rights and duties attaching to that in any case of conflict between the two (Art.9 TEU). 7. Would give the EU Court of Justice the power to decide our rights by making the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights legally binding for the first time (Art.6 TEU). This would give power to the EU judges to lay down a uniform standard of rights for the 500 million citizens of the post-Lisbon Union in the name of their common EU citizenship in the years to come. It would open the possibility of clashes with national human rights standards in sensitive areas where Member States differ from one another at present, e.g. property and inheritance rights, trial by jury, habeas corpus, legalising hard drugs, euthanasia, abortion, labour law, succession law, marriage law, children’s rights etc. Ireland’s Supreme Court and the Strasbourg Court of Human Rights would no longer have the final say on what our rights are. 8. Would abolish the national veto Ireland has at present in 32 new policy areas by handing over to the EU the power to make laws binding on us as regards public services, crime, justice, policing, immigration, energy, transport, tourism, sport, culture, public health, the EU budget, international moves on climate change etc. 9. Would reduce the power of National Parliaments to make laws in relation to 49 policy areas or matters by shifting their powers to the EU, and increase the influence of the European Parliament in making EU laws in 19 new areas (See euabc.eu for the two lists). 10. Would be a self-amending Treaty which would permit the EU Prime Ministers and Presidents to shift most remaining EU policy areas where unanimity is required and a national veto still exists – for example on tax harmonisation – to qualified majority voting on the EU Council of Ministers, without need of further EU Treaties or referendums(Art.48 TEU). 11. Would abolish our present right to “propose” and decide who Ireland’s Commissioner is, by replacing it with a right to make “suggestions” only, leaving it up to the incoming Commission President to decide (Art.17.7 TEU). The EU Prime Ministers have promised each State a permanent Commissioner, but what is the point of us continuing to have an Irish Commissioner post-Lisbon when the Irish Government can no longer decide who that Commissioner would be? 12. Would enable the 27 EU Prime Ministers to appoint an EU President for up to five years without allowing voters any say as to who he or she would be, thereby abolishing the present six-month rotating EU presidencies (Art.15 TEU). 13. Would militarize the EU further, requiring Member States “progressively to improve their military capabilities”(Art.42.3 TEU) and to aid and assist other Member States experiencing armed attack “by all the means in their power” (Art.42.7 TEU). _______ TEU = Treaty on European Union as amended by the Lisbon Treaty; TFEU= Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union as amended by the Lisbon Treaty. These two Treaties together would become the Constitution of the new post-Lisbon European Union. For more detailed information see nationalplatform.org and euabc.eu 3 Responses to “Summary of 13 things the Lisbon Treaty would do!”
Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Name (required) Mail (will not be published) (required) Web site
|
|
|||
|
well i didnt read your '13 reasons to say no' post but from what I understand, The lisbon treaty is going to take away all of our rights as a public to vetoe different treaties etc.
the fact that they're making us vote again is completely undemocractic but it looks like its going to pass so i guess we're all fucked lol |
|
||||
|
LEGALISATION DREAM IS DEAD AFTER OCT 2
yea dublinbud, as the posters on every lamp post say YES FOR JOBS. we all know thats bull shit. the french and dutch rejected it a few years ago and it didnt effect there econemy. IF THIS IS PASSED ON OCT 2 MY KIDS GENERATION ARE GONNA BE FUCKING SLAVES FOR FACELESS UNELECTED EUROCRATS. SO NO MORE DREAMS OF LEGALISATION..
|
|
||||
|
once big companies own the supersized E.U they will never let legalisation happen. alcohol profits would decrease and so would backhanders to greedy politicians...
but hay looking at the polls we are fucked on this. you can go to cali, but im heading for the mountains with a bag of seeds and a sawn off ![]()
|
|
||||
|
Ah yes the Sugar loaf, how apt to grow in the Garden of Ireland (ha ha).
Seriously though, i do a bit of travelling and it's interesting that the more affluent areas of Dublin and the country has YES posters plastered everywhere and the less affable areas have predominantly NO posters. Could this referendum be as simple as a YES vote will keep the rich in the manner which they have become accustomed and the downtrodden firmly under the boot? |
|
||||
|
eddie, you could be right man. i havnt seen a no poster on the south side yet. what amazes me is people are going to believe the same politicians who helped waste and squander hundreds of millions during the tiger years.
remember.. e-voting machines( sitting in a dusty warehouse now) the under water millenium clock(couldnt be seen in the dirty liffey) the national aquatic centre( with leaky roof) the port tunnell( not tall enough for new trucks) its like an epsode of the simpsons... irish politicians are inept and i dont trust anything they say. |
|
|||
|
.
it was no last time & it will be no this time.
we went to eindhoven a few days after the last treaty was rejected & everyone in the coffee shops was thanking us for voting no, if you don't vote no for ireland vote no for Holland |
|
||||
|
Just puttin it out there lads its just a thought, from what ive heard if we pass this treaty we're handing over more power to the EU. With europe being fairly lenient towards cannabis this might be the first step to decriminalisation. I know its a long shot but c'mon like what government in this country is ever gonna have that, We're all complaining about the government being shit but we want them to have all the power too? Its not exactly my reasoning and i havnt decided what way im voting yet, but i have being doing a lot of thinkin lol
![]() "arguing over the interent is like winning the special olympics. Even if you win, you are still a downie" Last edited by Corkboyhigh; Sep-29-2009 at 18:34. |
|
||||
|
i could be wrong but is europe soft on cannabis?, its easy to score in copenhagen i know that. but the dutch christian party are in government now and they are starting to reduce the amount of coffee shops in amsterdam. i have been twice a year for over a decade now and the number of coffee shops is getting smaller each year. they are starting to rethink there policy on drugs and i was reading in soft secrets the amount of busts for growing is increaasing every month. the cops now have private firms going from street to street with heat seeking technology on top of vans.. get to the dam while you can because in a few years it might be fucked...
|
|
|||
|
.
many european countries are taking a softer approach to cannabis but here is where the problem is, the EU takes a very hard stance against drugs of all kind including cannabis (not alcohol of course, its good for you), Spain, Belgium, Holland & Portugal all take a soft approach to cannabis, but these are the countries that will loose out if the treaty goes through, i have heard many Irish & EU politicans say it.
So if the treaty goes ahead you are garenteed a hard stance on cannabis and the countries that want to take a soft approach wont have a choice in it. sounds fucked, it is. Last edited by moshmonkey; Sep-30-2009 at 04:33. |
|
||||
|
good man mosh..now your thinking...
IF THE LISBON TREATY IS RATTAFIED..... countries will get votes based on the size of there population... it will take 65% of the european population to pass a law that will effect us on our little island. that means germany, the u.k ,france and some other small populated country could vote in laws even 14 smaller countries could not stop it... its not the people who want this passed..its politicians.... GIVE EUROPE ITS OWN REFERENDUM..LET THE PEOPLE HAVE THERE SAY.. |
|
||||
|
10 YEAR DOUBLE DIPPED HOFFMAN
AS TONIGHT COULD BE THE LAST NIGHT OF IRISH INDEPENDANCE IM GONNA GET WASTED. I HAVE A 100 YEAR DOUBLE DIPPED HOFFMAN THAT IVE BEEN SAVING AND TONIGHTS THE NIGHT.. TOOK ONE A FEW WEEKS AGO AND HAD A CONVERSATION WITH A SPIDER ON THE WALL FOR 4 HOURS.SO TONIGHT SHOULD BE A TRIP
__________________
BRAINSTORM,VOODOO AND POWER PLANT GROWLOG |
|
||||
|
wow!!!!! what a night... held a referendum party with a http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:4...wist_fade3.giftwist..
so there has been a massive shift in the yes vote. its gonna be passed. arise tony blair. the first president of europe come on poland and czech republic..dont ratify this treaty
__________________
BRAINSTORM,VOODOO AND POWER PLANT GROWLOG |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
|
|