The Constitution as a Basis for God's/Nature's Inalienable Rights
------------------------------------------------------------
All Plants have been granted to mankind and all of Earth's creatures by God and/or Nature. These are Inalienable Rights over which No Man or This Government can legally (according to the Constitution) interfere.

Like a platform on which to base Pot Legalization: (IMO, alot better than I want to smoke pot. Under the Real Constitution The People are allowed to ingest any plant (manufactured products are exempt, only natural plants will qualify)). Under the Historical Background Constitution Virtually All of this governments abuses against it's own people are illegal.

The US Is "a Distorted, Bastardized Form of Illegitimate Government."
U-STEPUP Questions: Why Isn't That Enough to Unite the Minor Political Parties?

"Do not separate text from historical background. If you do, you will have perverted and subverted the Constitution, which can only end in a distorted, bastardized form of illegitimate government." --- James Madison.

James Madison, "Father of The Constitution", and all of the signers of The Constitution were adamant, or in agreement with the historical background interpretation. Without a historical background interpretation, our Constitutional Founders could not give The People their inalienable rights and protection from their own government. They made sure their intent was known via various quotes, manuscripts and Preambles..

Ever seen the Preamble to the Bill of Rights? The People are informed of the Preamble to the Constitution whenever the Constitution is referenced. Yet, the Preamble is rarely seen when referring to the Bill of Rights. Immediately after: the official notice of time, place, and who, the very next paragraph of The Preamble to The Bill of Rights is: "THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution." (The Preamble started out as an amendment, but, apparently after discussion, it was felt that this was too important to make just an amendment. The Constitution had a Preamble. The Bill of Rights, which was required for ratification of The Constitution, certainly should have one too.)

Yet, these predominately learned lawyers of this klepto-nazi'cratic government, don't have a clue on how to interpret "this Constitution". Where do the other interpretations enter "this Constitution". There are no ratified others. (Continued at: http://thepriceofliberty.org/ward.htm ).

Please increase your Rights by forwarding this post to all that may be interested. Another Article, "The Historical Background Constitution" will more clearly elucidate what Rights have been stolen from The People by this kepto-nazi'crat government.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Ed Ward, MD, MT.